Tensile Test Report
EPCO's bow and stern eyes are designed for mooring boats in
accordance with ABYC H-40.3 and are
not intended for lifting boats. The tensile strength of the 304 and
316 series stainless steel used in the production of these products
is an important consideration for designers when selecting what style,
diameter and material that is used in their product.
EPCO engaged a major midwestern university to conduct tests to report
its findings as to the points of failure that were obtained while
doing three different tests. The tests were done on a straight pull
tensile test (Figures 1 & 2 Tensile Test), an edge pull (Figures
3 & 4 Edge Pull) and a side pull (Figures 5 & 6 Side Pull).
The tests were conducted from June 10 - August 18, 2003.*
The tests were done on randomly selected production samples of both 304 and 316 series stainless steel bow eyes. Fixtures for each series of tests were fabricated at the university to accommodate tensile, side pull, and edge pull on the bow eyes. Copies of material certifications were provided with the test samples.
 |
 |
| Figure 1 Tensile Test |
Figure 2 Bow Eye Tensile Failure |
 |
 |
| Figure 3 Edge Pull |
Figure 4 Bow Eye Edge Failure |
 |
 |
| Figure 5 Side Pull |
Figure 6 Side Pull Failure |
The representative samples of 304 and 316 series stainless steel
that were tested were EPCO part numbers:
- 151 5/8" diameter—cut thread
- 113 1/2" diameter—cut thread
- 164 .446" diameter—roll thread
- 123 .331" diameter—roll thread
| Failure Loads for Bow Eyes—August 27, 2003 |
| Tensile (lbs) |
TYPE |
151 |
113 |
164 |
123 |
| |
304 |
47,000 |
31,400 |
31,900 |
18,000 |
| |
316 |
36,300 |
28,800 |
29,900 |
16,800 |
 |
| Edge (lbs) |
TYPE |
151 |
113 |
164 |
123 |
| |
304 |
18,400 |
18,900 |
11,200 |
7,500 |
| |
316 |
21,100 |
21,000 |
14,500 |
11,200 |
 |
| Side (lbs) |
TYPE |
151 |
113 |
164 |
123 |
| |
304 |
6,400 |
3,900 |
10,600 |
6,000 |
| |
316 |
32,300 |
3,400 |
3,500 |
11,700 |
June 10, 2003 - August 18, 2003 Test Conclusion
"Tensile tests results and edge pull test results correlate
to expectations of material behavior for a single test situation.
Side pull tests are not as conclusive, even with a second series
of tests. However, with an appropriate factor for safety, side pull
results can be used." —quote
from test report on August 27, 2003
*Complete
Test Report (PDF)
Statement of Compliance
All the products that EPCO produces meet or exceed the
requirements for that product as defined by ABYC
H-40. |